Thứ Năm, 25 tháng 6, 2020

COMMUNIST VIETNAM INTERNATIONAL CRIME. The Case of Dong Tam (RFA) Vietnam Indicts 25 Dong Tam Protesters on Murder-Related Charges. (RFA) Vietnam Arrests Four For Sharing Info on Dong Tam Police Raid

COMMUNIST VIETNAM INTERNATIONAL CRIME

SRVN The Case of Dong Tam

----

World

Vietnam sentences brothers to death after violent land clash

Twenty-seven others were handed varying sentences, from a 15-month suspended sentence to life in prison
Twenty-seven others were handed varying sentences, from a 15-month suspended sentence to life in prison

A Vietnam court sentenced two brothers to death Monday after a long-running land dispute spiralled into rare violence which left three police officers and a villager dead.

Residents of Dong Tam commune in a Hanoi suburb have for years clashed with authorities, accusing the military of illegally seizing their farmland for an airport.

In January officials attempted to erect a perimeter fence, but were met with villagers armed with "grenades, petrol bombs and knives", according to the Ministry of Public Security.

The clash left three police officers and an elderly resident, Le Dinh Kinh, dead.

Villagers have a different account of the incident, accusing authorities of attacking Kinh in his sleep. He was believed to be the leader of the farmers' resistance.

Kinh's two sons -- Le Dinh Chuc, 40, and Le Dinh Cong, 56 -- were among dozens arrested in the aftermath of the violence.

The Hanoi court sentenced the brothers "to death for murder" of the three police officers, according to state media.

Twenty-seven others were handed varying sentences, from a 15-month suspended sentence to life in prison.

Defence lawyer Le Luan called the trial "unfair", and said the defence team had proposed it be postponed pending further investigation into the incident.

"We do not agree with the verdict given by the court today; we don't even agree with the trial itself," he told AFP.

Human Rights Watch decried the "heavy sentences" coming after a "rushed" trial, which started last week.

"This trial was plagued by serious procedural concerns that clearly undermined any possibility of fair process," said HRW's Phil Robertson.

It is difficult to verify the authorities' version of events, as the communist country strictly controls all media and information dissemination.

Land disputes are common in Vietnam, where powerful individuals and companies often make claims on property.

Freedom of expression is restricted, as is the right to protest, but flashpoints occur.

In 2017, the Dong Tam villagers held more than a dozen police officers and officials hostage for several days at the airport site in a standoff that gripped the tightly-controlled country.

bur/dhc/rma

World

Vietnam court sentences 2 to death over land dispute clash

HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — A Vietnamese court on Monday sentenced two villagers to death in the killings of three policemen during a clash over a land dispute, state media reported. Twenty-seven other villagers received sentences of up to life imprisonment.

The newspaper Vietnam News said half brothers Le Dinh Cong and Le Dinh Chuc received the death sentences for their roles in burning the three policemen to death in the village in a suburb of Hanoi in January.

The 84-year-old father of the two men, village elder Le Dinh Kinh, was fatally shot during the violence, it said.

The newspaper said four other defendants were also charged with murder. Of them, Cong’s son, Le Dinh Doanh, was sentenced to life imprisonment while three others were given jail terms ranging from 12 to 16 years, Vietnam News said.

The defendants were accused of killing the three policemen using grenades, firebombs and spears as the authorities advanced on the village in Dong Tam commune. The police were trying to stop the villagers from blocking the building of a wall around a military airport on land they said belonged to the village.

The newspaper quoted the judge as saying in the verdict that the assailants carried out the murders in a brutal way and used methods for mass killing.

The 23 other defendants were accused of “opposing those who are on public duties" and received sentences ranging from 15 months to six years, the newspaper said.

Land disputes are common in Vietnam because the government does not recognize private land ownership. Land can be taken for infrastructure and investment projects, and disagreements over compensation often lead to prolonged disputes.

“The heavy sentences against the Dong Tam defendants, including the death sentence against two persons, come as no surprise,” said Phil Robertson, Asia deputy director for New York-based Human Rights Watch.

“Vietnam’s rulers are bending over backwards to show their toughest possible face against the Dong Tam villagers because they worry this community’s defiance could be contagious unless the defendants are hit with the most severe penalties,” Robertson said.

World

Dong Tam case: Two sentenced to death in Vietnam over police killings

A court in Vietnam has sentenced two brothers to death for their role in the killing of three policemen in a notorious land dispute in January.

The other 27 people on trial were given sentences ranging from life imprisonment to 15 months suspended.

Le Dinh Cong and his younger brother Le Dinh Chuc helped mastermind resistance against the police, the court ruled.

Their father, retired local official Le Dinh Kinh, 84, was shot dead by police who had entered Dong Tam village.

The authorities had been trying to secure construction of a fence around land officials were trying to seize next to an airfield.

The raid and the unexplained circumstances around the death of the popular local leader caused huge public controversy. Land disputes are common in Vietnam, but rarely escalate into such conflict.

The two death sentences and long prison terms have been interpreted by many as a warning by the government against resisting seizures of private land, said Tina Thanh-Ha Vu of the BBC's Vietnamese service.

One defendant, Le Dinh Doanh, received a life sentence, several received sentences of between 12 and 15 years, and others lesser prison terms.

The defence counsel protested that the time allotted to them in court to make their case had been significantly shortened.

What happened in Dong Tam?

Police arrived in the village in January to help secure land seized by the defence ministry around the Mieu Mon airport, close to Dong Tam, as the army built a boundary fence.

The land was already subject to a dispute with villagers, who said they had not been properly recompensed for its seizure.

According to authorities, a group of residents led by Le Dinh Kinh violently resisted the police, and three officers - Col Nguyen Huy Thinh, Cpt Pham Cong Huy and Lt Duong Duc Hoang Quan - were set on fire and burned to death.

 

The Case of Murder at Dong Tam Village

-----

Vietnam Indicts 25 Dong Tam Protesters on Murder-Related Charges

Village leader Le Dinh Kinh's body is shown (L) bearing bruises next to a photo of Hanoi police deployed at Dong Tam commune on Jan. 9, 2020.
Village leader Le Dinh Kinh's body is shown (L) bearing bruises next to a photo of Hanoi police deployed at Dong Tam commune on Jan. 9, 2020.


Authorities in Vietnam indicted 25 people on murder-related charges for their involvement in a deadly clash over land rights that left three police officers and a protest leader dead, in January at the Dong Tam commune outside Hanoi.

Dong Tam village elder Le Dinh Kinh, 84, was shot and killed by police during the Jan. 9 raid on the village by 3,000 security officers intervening in a long-running dispute over a military airport construction site about 25 miles south of the capital.

The Hanoi People’s Procuracy on Thursday released the indictments after a 20-day investigation, according to state media, accusing the slain man’s son Le Dinh Chuc, and grandsons Le Dinh Doanh and Le Dinh Uy of murder, with 22 more charged as being accomplices to murder.

In addition to Le Dinh Kinh, three police officers died in the police raid at Dong Tam in January.

If convicted they could face a minimum of 12 years or be given the death penalty.

Four others from the village were accused of obstructing officers in the performance of their duty, a charge which carries a jail sentence of between two and seven years.

Police said that the trial will begin soon due to the importance of the case.

Though official reports said that villagers had assaulted police with grenades and petrol bombs in the early morning raid, a report drawn from witness accounts and released seven days later by journalists and activists said that police had attacked first during the deadly clash.

Police blocked off pathways and alleys during the attack and beat villagers “indiscriminately, including women and old people,” the report said, calling the assault “possibly the bloodiest land dispute in Vietnam in the last ten years.”

In an earlier flare up of the dispute that goes back to 1980, farmers detained 38 police officers and local officials during a weeklong standoff in April 2017.

In July 2017, the Hanoi Inspectorate announced that after conducting a “comprehensive inspection,” it had determined that the site belongs to the military.

The inspectorate rejected the farmer’s claims that 47 hectares (116 acres) of their farmland was seized for the military-run Viettel Group—the country’s largest mobile phone operator—without adequately compensating them.

It acknowledged that the military had “made several mistakes in management” of the land, including allowing area residents to use it after a rental contract expired in 2012 and failing to relocate certain households before 1980, leading to illegal encroachment and construction.

While all land in Vietnam is ultimately held by the state, land confiscations have become a flashpoint as residents accuse the government of pushing small landholders aside in favor of lucrative real estate projects, and of paying too little in compensation.

Reported by RFA’s Vietnamese Service. Translated by Huy Le. Written in English by Eugene Whong.

----
RFA

Vietnam Arrests Four For Sharing Info on Dong Tam Police Raid

A gate at the Dong Tam commune outside Hanoi is shown in an April 21, 2017 photo.
A gate at the Dong Tam commune outside Hanoi is shown in an April 21, 2017 photo.
Reuters
Vietnamese authorities arrested four people Wednesday for alerting foreign diplomats about a deadly clash between police and land rights protesters in January at the Dong Tam commune outside Hanoi, police and relatives of the detainees said.
The four had been outspoken in social media postings about the Dong Tam clash, in which three police officers and a village leader died in a raid on protesters in a bitter land dispute, and had openly offered information to embassies and other foreign figures to try to raise awareness of the incident.
Their arrests bring to a dozen the number of Vietnamese taken in for posts on Facebook, in what rights groups say is part of an intensifying crackdown on human rights activists and dissidents six months before the Communist Party of Vietnam’s next five-yearly party congress
Activist Can Thi Theu, her sons Trinh Ba Phuong and Trinh Ba Tu, and land rights petitioner Nguyen Thi Tam were charged with “making, storing, distributing or disseminating information, documents and items against the Socialist Republic of Vietnam” in violation of Article 117 of the penal code.
Trinh Thi Thao, daughter of Can Thi Theu and sister of the Trinh brothers, told RFA’s Vietnamese Service how police took in her mother and brother Ba Phuong at their home in Duong Noi ward, Ha Dong district, Hanoi.
“They read the search warrant and accused my brother of spreading information against the state,” she said.
The Jan. 9 raid on Dong Tam protesters, involving 3,000 security officers, was the latest flare-up of a long-running dispute over a military airport construction site about 25 miles south of Hanoi.
Wednesday’s arrests occurred about almost week after Hanoi Police concluded their investigation about the clash, with a finding accusing 29 citizens of murder and obstructing on-duty police officers.
In a video made and posted on Facebook in apparent anticipation of his arrest, Trinh Ba Phuong showed the police attempting to drag away two women who were standing in front of his house, while an officer in the uniform of a firefighter used pliers to break into the house.
“Everybody, if I am arrested, do not worry about me,” he said, adding that was in good health and had no thoughts of suicide -- a statement issued to thwart official deception should he die while in custody.
“If they arrest me today it means they are arresting me because of Dong Tam. I hope the international community and all foreign organizations are taking notice of the Dong Tam incident,” Trinh Ba Phuong said.
“There are 29 people in Dong Tam commune facing harsh sentences.”
“I tried to send out truthful information, accurate images and photos to the Vietnamese public and the international community, but they consider everything I have done to be an attempt to affect the investigating organizations and the political system,” he added.
An officer at the Duong Noi ward police station confirmed the arrests of Can and Trinh, but directed further questions to the Hanoi police hotline. The Hanoi police told RFA to contact the Ha Dong district police, but RFA was unable to connect with the district station.
Ba Tu, the older Trinh brother, was arrested in nearby Hoa Binh province, where police first detained his father, Trinh Ba Khiem from his home near, Ba Tu’s.
“Early this morning, police came to my home before I was even up,” he told RFA’s Vietnamese Service.
“They broke down my door and forced their way in and restrained me. They searched the house and collected come documents, then took me to Ba Tu’s house,” he said.
“The police entered his house and restrained him while they searched the place. I didn’t hear anything about any arrest warrant,” he added.
The family has had several run-ins with the authorities over the past few years.
In September 2014, the husband and wife were sentenced by Hanoi police to 15 months in jail for “disturbing public order,” for joining in land enforcement protests.
In 2016, Can was arrested again when she participated in a protest in Dong Da district. She was sentenced by the court to 20 months in jail for again “disturbing public order.”
Others arrested on article 117
Also on Wednesday, two activists in the southern part of the country were arrested for violating Article 117.
Nguyen Thi Cam Thuy of Khanh Hoa province had live-streamed herself and others burning Vietnamese flags and a portrait of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh.
Vu Tien Chi of Lam Dong province had created several Facebook accounts and used them to share stories deemed to be slander against the state and party leaders.
John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, said the arrests for social media posts are part of a wide and heavy-handed campaign to suppress dissent to make the Communist Party of Vietnam’s 13th party congress scheduled for January 2021 appear to run smoothly.
“Vietnam has basically made it a crime to use the internet or social media platforms to voice opinions or engage in debate,” Sifton said in a statement on June 19.
The 88 Project, an Illinois-based NGO that tracks Vietnamese political prisoners, this week reported that in 2019 an increasing number of people were arrested under article 117.
“Many of those charged with this crime had no history of activism and
were solely targeted for their peaceful expression online. Forty percent of the people arrested in 2019 were online commentators,” the NGO said.
Vietnam, with a population of 92 million people, of which 55 million are estimated to be users of Facebook, has been consistently rated “not free” in the areas of internet and press freedom by Freedom House, a U.S.-based watchdog group.
Dissent is not tolerated in the communist nation, and authorities routinely use a set of vague provisions in the penal code to detain dozens of writers and bloggers.
Reported by RFA’s Vietnamese Service. Translated by Huy Le. Written in English by Eugene Whong.

INTERSPACE COMMUNICATION June 25, 2020. (Reuters) UK's Supreme Court dismisses Huawei and ZTE patent appeals. (The Telegraph) Huawei's role in Britain's 5G network at risk after US sanctions, minister says. (National Review) FCC Bans Funding to Huawei, ZTE over China Ties. (AFP) Huawei controversy opens field for 5G challengers. (Bloomberg) Huawei Loses Main Singapore 5G Networks to Ericsson, Nokia

INTERSPACE COMMUNICATION June 25, 2020
Tiemline Links: June 25, 2020
Timeline Links: June 8, 2020
Timeline Links: May 26, 2020
---

UK's Supreme Court dismisses Huawei and ZTE patent appeals

LONDON (Reuters) - The United Kingdom's Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously dismissed appeals by China's Huawei [HWT.UL] and ZTE in patent disputes over mobile data technology with Unwired Planet International and Conversant Wireless.

The first appeal concerned an action brought by Unwired against Huawei for the infringement of five UK patents, which Unwired had acquired from Ericsson and were said to be essential in mobile telecoms.

An English court had previously ruled that two of the patents were valid and essential, and in a subsequent trial found Unwired's licence terms were justified and enforceable.

The second appeal concerned action brought by Conversant against Huawei and ZTE for infringing four of its UK patents, which had been acquired from Nokia and related to LTE standards used by 4G handsets to download and send data.

Huawei and ZTE argued that the English Courts did not have jurisdiction to determine the validity of foreign patents.

But the trial judge had ruled against them, saying the court had jurisdiction under a international patent framework agreed by the mobile industry.

The Supreme Court said on Wednesday it had unanimously dismissed both appeals.

Conversant's CEO Boris Teksler said he was "very pleased" by the outcome, which the firm said would have "significant implications worldwide" for standard-essential-patent (SEP) licensing.

"It confirms Conversant Wireless' approach, that as a holder of cellular standard-essential patents, we can seek proper value for our patents without having to resort to what the UK courts themselves called the 'madness' of country-by-country licensing and related litigation," he said.

"This helps level the playing field when small companies are trying to license SEP portfolios to global giants with seemingly limitless litigation resources."

(Reporting by Paul Sandle; editing by Marc Jones)

---
The Telegraph

Huawei's role in Britain's 5G network at risk after US sanctions, minister says

Hannah Boland

https://www.yahoo.com/news/huaweis-role-britains-5g-network-153316889.html

US sanctions on Huawei, which were announced last month, have made the Chinese firm a less viable supplier for Britain's 5G network, the Digital Minister has said.

Speaking at a Defence sub-committee meeting, Oliver Dowden said the new rules from Washington, preventing Huawei from using US-made equipment, were "likely to have an impact on the viability of Huawei as a provider for the 5G network".

The measures are expected to come into force in September. Over the weekend, experts told The Sunday Telegraph that they could create security risks, given they would "dramatically change the whole security of the supply chain".

It could make it tougher for Huawei to develop its own advanced chips for use in telecoms equipment and smartphones, according to cyber security experts.

Mr Dowden's comments at the parliamentary committee meeting come just days before the National Cyber Security Centre is expected to complete a review into the impact of the US sanctions on Britain's relationship with Huawei.

Mr Dowden said the review was "pretty much finished and going through the final stage".

He said the Government had asked the NCSC to carry out the evaluation and that it was "clear eyed about the potential risk of Huawei".

Up until now, the Government has said it would be limiting Huawei to non-core parts of the 5G network, and only allow it to account for 35pc of the network following concerns over its safety.

However, there have been rumours it is planning a U-Turn on that decision and instead looking to block the Chinese firm altogether.

MPs today doubled down on a warning that the Government would not receive sufficient backing for a bill allowing Huawei any role in building the infrastructure, with Mark Francois asking: "Isn't the truth that everyone including you knows that the bill is dead as a dodo unless it excludes Huawei?"

Ben Wallace, the Defence Minister, who also appeared before the committee, said he was "not happy" about high risk vendors being in the network."The Government’s policy over time is to remove high risk vendors from the network," he said.

Victor Zhang, vice president of Huawei, said: “We are investing billions to make the prime minister’s vision of a ‘connected Kingdom’ a reality so that British families and businesses have access to fast, reliable mobile and broadband networks wherever they live.

"We have been in the UK for 20 years and remain focused on working with our customers and the government to ensure the country gets the jobs and economic growth created by 5G as quickly as possible.”

----
Politics

FCC Bans Funding to Huawei, ZTE over China Ties

Zachary Evans

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fcc-bans-funding-huawei-zte-184842172.html

The Federal Communications Commission has banned Huawei and the ZTE Coroporation from receiving federal funds because of the companies’ ties to the Chinese government.

The ban prevents both companies from drawing on the FCC’s Universal Service Fund, an $8.3 billion fund paid for by Americans via phone bill fees.

“The [FCC] has designated Huawei and ZTE as national security risks to America’s communications networks–and to our 5G future,” FCC chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement. “We cannot and will not allow the Chinese Communist Party to exploit network vulnerabilities and compromise our critical communications infrastructure.”

Both companies have been criticized by the U.S. for sharing data and information with the Chinese Communist Party. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has repeatedly urged allies including Germany and the U.K. not to allow Huawei to develop local 5G networks. Additionally, Pentagon Defense Innovation Board chairman Eric Schmidt, a former CEO of Google, has said Huawei can essentially act as “signals intelligence” for the CCP.

“The CCP has gained footholds in countries around the world with Huawei and ZTE under the premise that they are independent companies,” Senator Ben Sasse (R., Neb.) said in a statement. “The United States will not put US dollars in the communists’ pockets and today’s decision shows that. This is good for our national security and for our shared fight against China becoming the world’s leading superpower.”

More from National Review

----
AFP

Huawei controversy opens field for 5G challengers

Erwan LUCAS

https://www.yahoo.com/news/huawei-controversy-opens-field-5g-challengers-061813054.html

Technicians of South Korean telecom operator KT check an antenna for the 5G mobile network service in Seoul (AFP Photo/JUNG Yeon-Je)
Technicians of South Korean telecom operator KT check an antenna for the 5G mobile network service in Seoul (AFP Photo/JUNG Yeon-Je)

Tokyo (AFP) - With growing pressure to keep China's Huawei out of 5G network development, it could be time for firms like Japan's NEC and South Korea's Samsung to shine.

Washington has pushed allies to bar Huawei, a Chinese telecom giant, from building next-generation 5G mobile networks, claiming its equipment can be used to spy for Beijing.

Huawei denies the charges, but US pressure has prompted an about-turn in Britain.

The government had already pledged to cut the firm out of the most sensitive "core" elements of 5G that access personal data, and is now reportedly pushing for plans to end Huawei's involvement in Britain's 5G infrastructure by 2023.

But excluding Huawei is not without challenges, because there are currently only two alternatives in Europe for 5G equipment such as antennas and relay masts: Finland's Nokia and Sweden's Ericsson.

Britain has encouraged Washington to form a club of 10 democratic nations that could develop its own 5G technology, but there has been little movement so far.

"The vast majority of the commercial networks sold in the world come from the big three," said Sylvain Chevallier, in charge of telecoms at BearingPoint consultancy, referring to Huawei, Nokia and Ericsson.

"But a world of three is not good for operators, and if it goes down to two it will be worse still," he told AFP.

- Teaming up -

That leaves a tempting potential opening for telecoms firms like Samsung and NEC. But building a successful 5G network is no simple task.

That is a lesson Samsung has already learned. Despite being a major player in 3G, it found itself unable to compete with the big three on 4G and struggled to win commercial contracts.

"This has been a challenge for Samsung," said Daryl Schoolar, a mobile technology specialist at consulting group Omdia.

In building its 5G network, Samsung has so far focused on North America and parts of the Asia-Pacific region.

"So while operators may feel uncertain about Samsung Networks, they are much further along in the process of being a global presence than NEC," Schoolar added.

NEC does have some advantages, including a partnership in Japan with mobile operator Rakuten.

The firms have already cooperated on a 4G network and are now jointly developing a 5G system.

The Japanese firm is also a leader on undersea cables, fibre optic networks and -- thanks to its affiliate Netcracker -- logistics management software.

"Netcracker has a strong presence with operators in Europe, which could be a real entry point for NEC," said Stephane Teral, chief telecoms analyst at LightCounting, a market research firm.

- 'A major challenge' -

NEC is tightlipped about its contracts for mobile networks, saying only that it is holding feasibility demonstrations for "a number of customers and we are engaged in commercial discussions with others".

Britain's government has reportedly asked both NEC and Samsung to take part in demonstrations as it looks to diversify its 5G options.

And on Thursday, NEC announced a tie-up with Japanese operator NTT intended in part to speed up the development of a 5G network.

Samsung and NEC joined forces two years ago and have launched a joint marketing team to offer 5G products to European and Asian markets.

Still, the path ahead will be tough, said Schoolar.

"I think it's a major challenge for NEC. It requires more than radios, it requires investing in people who can do system integration, sales, customer support, network design and engineering," he said.

"Plus NEC will need to build operator trust that they will be there to support them in five to 10 years as those 5G networks evolve."

Washington has backed the use of non-proprietary technology like Open RAN in 5G development, hoping it will provide an entry point for US firms.

Such a move would open up opportunities for NEC, allowing them to "create an economic model that would shake up traditional equipment manufacturers," said Chevallier.

-----

Business

Huawei Loses Main Singapore 5G Networks to Ericsson, Nokia


Abhishek Vishnoi and Yoojung Lee