Thứ Sáu, 24 tháng 4, 2020

B-1 Returns to Pacific in 'Dynamic Force Employment' - High-Seas Energy Fight Off Malaysia Draws U.S., Chinese Warships

World

B-1 Returns to Pacific in 'Dynamic Force Employment'


Oriana Pawlyk
Military.com

B-1 Returns to Pacific in 'Dynamic Force Employment'

After ending its 16-year permanent bomber presence in Guam, the U.S. Air Force this week flew a B-1B Lancer to the Pacific as part of its new unpredictable deployment experiment to test crews' agility when sending heavy aircraft forces around the world.
The B-1, from the 28th Bomb Wing at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, flew a 30-hour round-trip flight to Japan. There, it operated alongside six U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons, seven Japan Air Self Defense Force F-2s and eight JASDF F-15s over Draughon Range near Misawa, Pacific Air Forces said in a release.
"This operation showcases our unwavering commitment to the security and stability of the Indo-Pacific region through the employment of strategic forces from around the globe," said Gen. Charles "CQ" Brown Jr., head of Pacific Air Forces and U.S. Indo-Pacific Command.
Related: After 16 Years, Air Force Ends Continuous Bomber Presence on Guam
"From confronting invisible threats of a global pandemic to addressing military aggression and coercive activities, we remain a lethal, innovative and interoperable force focused on a shared vision of upholding a free and open lndo-Pacific," he said in the release.
"Like the advancements of our agile combat employment concept of operations, we continue to innovate and adapt our approach, to include how we deploy and employ the various weapons systems we integrate with our allies and partners," Brown said. "Bringing the B-1 into theater ensures our bilateral interoperability accounts for any combination of flying operations to prepare for and outpace the rapidly growing threats in the Indo-Pacific region."
The show-of-force flights come as Pentagon officials in recent weeks have stressed continued operations to deter rivals, despite the novel coronavirus pandemic.
"Adversaries who think now is the time to challenge the USA: You're dangerously wrong," Defense Secretary Mark Esper said in a tweet last week.
On Friday, Esper renewed the message. "Our adversaries are not standing down," he said. "We will continue to make sure that the [Defense Department] is ready to protect the USA."
Last week, Air Force Global Strike Command announced that it is transitioning to a new model, ending the continuous bomber presence (CBP) mission in favor of forward-deploying bombers to the Indo-Pacific. For the last year, AFGSC officials have planned more and shorter strategic bomber rotations. The concept, known as "dynamic force employment," mimics how the service often sends its bomber forces to Europe for weeks-long summer exercises.
The B-1 -- call sign HYPER21 -- was spotted Tuesday flying over the Bering Sea near Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, crossing over into the northern Pacific. The news was first reported by The Drive, citing movements reported by tracker @AircraftSpots on Twitter.
The Lancer's return to the Pacific, albeit short, marks the first for the long-range bomber since 2018. Between 2016 and 2018, the B-1 held the CBP deterrence mission, housed at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.
"The rapid employment of airpower directly supports the National Defense Strategy and assures we can provide overwhelming force anywhere, anytime in support of American interests or our allies and partners," said Gen. Tim Ray, AFGSC commander. "This mission is a demonstration to our friends throughout the region: We will continue to remain fully predictable in our commitment to ensuring peace, while also demonstrating that we have the ability to operate from numerous locations across the globe, even during the global pandemic."
The latest flight was the second bilateral training to occur with a bomber this year, officials said. In February, two B-52 Stratofortress bombers flew alongside six Air Force F-16s and more than 45 JASDF fighter aircraft near Japan, according to the release.
-- Oriana Pawlyk can be reached at oriana.pawlyk@military.com. Follow her on Twitter at @Oriana0214.
Read more: COVID-19 Outbreak Forces Destroyer Kidd to Return to Port, Offload Crew

World


High-Seas Energy Fight Off Malaysia Draws U.S., Chinese Warships


Philip J. Heijmans
Bloomberg

(Bloomberg) -- Malaysia’s push to explore energy blocks off its coast has turned into a five-nation face off involving U.S. and Chinese warships, raising the risk of a direct confrontation as broader tensions grow between the world’s biggest economies.
The episode began in December, when Malaysia’s state-run energy giant Petroliam Nasional Bhd. contracted a vessel to explore two areas in the South China Sea in its extended continental shelf. Those waters are also claimed by Vietnam and China, which immediately sent ships to shadow the boat.
The situation took a turn for the worse on April 16 with the arrival of a Chinese surveyor known as the Haiyang Dizhi 8, which last year was engaged in a standoff with Vietnam over offshore energy blocks. The U.S. this week sent at least two warships within some 50 nautical miles of the Malaysian ship, according to defense analysts privy to the information who asked not to be identified.
U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo on Thursday accused China of “exploiting” the world’s focus on the Covid-19 pandemic with provocations in the South China Sea. In a statement issued on the same day he held a video call with 10 Southeast Asian foreign ministers, he said China “dispatched a flotilla that included an energy survey vessel for the sole purpose of intimidating other claimants from engaging in offshore hydrocarbon development.”
“The U.S. strongly opposes China’s bullying and we hope other nations will hold them to account too,” Pompeo said.
Territorial Disputes
The U.S. doesn’t take a position on territorial disputes in the region even while staking a national interest in freedom of navigation, which involves challenging any claims that aren’t consistent with international laws. As China gets more assertive in enforcing its claims, it’s increased the risk of a potential confrontation with the U.S. that could quickly escalate.
The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command confirmed Wednesday that three ships -- the USS America, an amphibious assault ship; the USS Bunker Hill, a guided missile cruiser; and the USS Barry, an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer -- were operating in the South China Sea, without giving a precise location. They were joined by an Australian Anzac-class frigate on April 18, according to the U.S. 7th Fleet.
“The risk of a new incident is rising, as tension elsewhere in the relationship could inflame the situation on the ground, or rather, in the water,” New York-based risk consultancy Eurasia Group said in an analysis on Wednesday. “Growing animosity between the two sides would it make it difficult to prevent an accidental collision from becoming a full-blown crisis.”
Without a direct threat from the U.S., China has increasingly disrupted the efforts of Vietnam, the Philippines -- and increasingly Malaysia -- to exploit oil, gas and fishing resources off their shores. China claims about 80% of the South China Sea through its so-called “nine-dash line,” and its increasing economic might has allowed it to invest in bigger ships that can operate ever-further from its shores.
It’s unknown how much recoverable oil and gas is in the disputed Malaysian blocks at the center of the standoff. But if China blocks all future exploration activities within the nine-dash line, the Malaysian company known as Petronas would be robbed of domestic drilling opportunities at a time when it’s trying to boost spending at home amid an economic slump.
‘Overt Challenge’
This is “by far the biggest and most overt challenge yet to Malaysia’s South China Sea energy interests,” said Collin Koh Swee Lean, research fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
Malaysia sought to tamp down tensions on Thursday, with Minister of Foreign Affairs Hishammuddin Hussein calling for all parties to work together to maintain peace.
“We must avoid unintended, accidental incidents in these waters,” he said. “While international law guarantees the freedom of navigation, the presence of warships and vessels in the South China Sea has the potential to increase tensions that in turn may result in miscalculations which may affect peace, security and stability in the region.”
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang this week said its survey ship was “conducting normal activities in waters under Chinese jurisdiction” and called the situation “basically stable.” At least half a dozen armed Chinese coast guard ships and several militia were involved, according to Greg Poling, director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative in Washington.
Poling said China last year took similar actions against Petronas and Royal Dutch Shell Plc in Malaysian waters as they conducted at least two other surveys of its continental shelf.
That was similar to China’s actions against Vietnam, when it repeatedly sent coast guard ships and the Haiyang Dizhi 8 to an energy block operated by Russia’s state-owned Rosneft Oil Co PJSC. The situation drew criticism from the U.S. and the European Union.
“It’s the exact same operation we saw conducted against Vietnam when Rosneft was drilling a new well last year,” Poling said by email. “But this is more problematic because it has become so public, and because Petronas has invested so much time and expense in exploring fields this far out. I have no idea whether they’re likely to be commercially viable, but I do know that there’s no chance of Petronas actually producing hydrocarbons from them in the current environment.”
Petronas did not immediately reply to a request to comment.
Other incidents are occurring elsewhere in the South China Sea. Earlier this month, U.S. State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus condemned China for reportedly sinking a Vietnamese fishing vessel on April 2.
China on Saturday announced the establishment of districts on the disputed Paracel and Spratly islands, drawing protests from both the Philippines and Vietnam. Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin also accused China of pointing a radar gun at a Philippine Navy ship in the country’s waters.
China and Southeast Asian claimants have sparred over which claims are valid under the United Nations Convention for the Law of the Sea, known as Unclos. Both sides have also been working on a code of conduct meant to resolve these types of confrontations in the South China Sea, though talks have dragged on for more than a decade.
“China is pushing the Southeast Asian countries to give up their Unclos rights and share their ‘exclusive’ economic zones with it,” said Bill Hayton, author of “The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia.” “If they try to develop their resources on their own, as is their right, China punishes them.”
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

U.S. Wants to Know Where Aluminum Imports Really Come From

Business

U.S. Wants to Know Where Aluminum Imports Really Come From

 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. proposed rules to track aluminum imports more closely, in a move that could address industry demands to block Chinese supply that skirts tariffs.
While the Trump administration’s import levies are aimed at protecting against excess foreign supply of the metal, concerns have persisted that aluminum from China -- the world’s biggest producer -- is still flooding into the market.
That’s because some Chinese supply could first be sent to another nation that isn’t subject to the duties. It’s then melted and reformed before being shipped again, masking its true origin. Criticism about surplus metal entering the U.S. via such transshipment and re-labeling to circumvent trade laws has preceded the Trump administration.
Under the proposed new U.S. rules, importers will be required to identify the country from which the aluminum was originally obtained. They will also need to get a license for shipments. The program is modeled on a steel-import monitoring system that’s been in place for years.
The Commerce Department’s regulations, which are subject to a 30-day public-comment period and would take another 30 to 90 days to be implemented, would give customs officials a strengthened tool to more quickly identify and react to improper trading of U.S.-bound aluminum.
Combating Evasion
“It is yet another affirmation of our commitment to use all available tools to combat circumvention and evasion of duties,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in a statement Wednesday. “Today’s proposed regulations are an important step forward in ensuring that trade in aluminum is free, fair, and reciprocal.”
Under the new North American trade deal signed last year, the U.S., Canada and Mexico all agreed to ramp up efforts to trace where metal comes from originally in an effort to stop the diversion of shipments from other nations to dodge tariffs. After the agreement, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acted to beef up the government’s power to respond to dumping of aluminum and steel in the country.
As recently as December, the Aluminium Association of Canada complained that the new North American trade law has failed to implement rules that would prevent transshipment of metal through Mexico. Chief Executive Officer Jean Simard said it made Mexico “more or less China’s North American backyard to dispose of the products of its overcapacity.”
Mexico’s aluminum association, Instituto Mexicano del Aluminio, voiced its support for the Commerce Department’s proposal, saying that it will do all it can to help the U.S. stop unfair trade practices.
Association President Fernando Garcia stressed that the Asian country accounts for 1% or less of Mexico’s primary and semi-finished imports. The majority of aluminum imported from China is can sheet, almost all of which the Latin American nation consumes, he said.
“I want to make clear that Mexico is not doing any kind of irregular practices with the transformation of materials coming from China and then resent to the USA,” Garcia said in a phone interview. The association meets with Mexico’s commerce department monthly to analyze all imports and exports, he said.
The U.S. Commerce Department is making the proposal just as the coronavirus pandemic has crushed demand in everything from retail goods to bank financing to commodities.
Demand Hit
U.S. aluminum has been particularly affected, with all domestic smelters under water at current prices. Alcoa Corp., the biggest American producer, said last week that it would curtail all production at one of its smelters in Washington state.
If implemented, the new rules would include monitoring imports of so-called semi-finished aluminum products. Alcoa has for years complained about China’s surging output of such products, which aren’t subject to the Asian country’s export taxes.
Semi-finished, not primary aluminum, is the principal form of China’s market penetration into the rest of the world, which Alcoa Chief Executive Officer Roy Harvey said in January is flooding the global market and effectively displacing output of the primary form of the metal.
China is the world’s largest exporter of the primary and semi-finished forms of aluminum, according to CRU Group. The country exports about 6 million metric tons annually, with about 90% to 95% of that being semi-fabricated products.
(Adds comments from Mexico’s industry association in 9th, 10th and 11th paragraphs.)
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
Business

FCC may halt U.S. operations of three state-controlled Chinese telecom firms



By David Shepardson

By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Friday said it may shut down the U.S. operations of three state-controlled Chinese telecommunications companies, citing national security risks.
The FCC issued so-called show cause orders to China Telecom Americas, China Unicom Americas, Pacific Networks Corp and its wholly owned subsidiary ComNet (USA) LLC, directing them to explain why it should not start the process of revoking authorizations enabling their U.S. operations.
"We simply cannot take a risk and hope for the best when it comes to the security of our networks," FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement.
The FCC granted its approvals to the firms more than a decade ago. Since then, it said, "the national security and law enforcement risks linked to the Chinese government’s activities have grown significantly."
The agency's show cause orders referred to the "sophistication and resulting damage of the Chinese government’s involvement in computer intrusions and attacks against the United States," but did not elaborate.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Justice Department and other federal agencies called on the FCC to revoke China Telecom's ability to operate in the United States.
In May 2019, the FCC voted unanimously to deny another state-owned Chinese telecommunications company, China Mobile Ltd, the right to provide services in the United States, citing risks that the Chinese government could use the approval to conduct espionage against the U.S. government.
China Telecom Americas is the U.S. subsidiary of a People’s Republic of China state-owned telecommunications company. A spokesman for China Telecom did not immediately comment on Friday.
A company spokesman denied any wrongdoing earlier this month, however, saying China Telecom has "been extremely cooperative and transparent with regulators."
The other companies named in the show cause orders did not respond to requests for comment.
Pacific Networks resells international voice and data to U.S. operators on a wholesale basis and ComNet provides international termination service, global SIM card service and international calling card service and interexchange service, the FCC said.
China's telecommunications networks and companies have come under heightened scrutiny by U.S. agencies.
Earlier this month, the FCC agreed to allow Alphabet Inc unit Google to use part of an U.S.-Asia undersea telecommunications cable but not a part that connected with Hong Kong.
Google agreed to operate only a portion of the 8,000-mile (12,875 km) Pacific Light Cable Network System between the United States and Taiwan. Google and Facebook Inc helped pay for construction of the now completed telecommunications link but U.S. regulators have blocked its use.

(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Tom Brown)

FILE PHOTO: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) logo is seen before the FCC Net Neutrality hearing in Washington

Bloomberg

FCC Threatens to Bar China Telecom and Others Over Security


Todd Shields
Bloomberg

(Bloomberg) -- The Federal Communications Commission threatened to bar four telecommunications operators unless they can show they’re independent from the Chinese government, the latest in the agency’s efforts to limit Beijing’s role in U.S. networks.
The agency named China Telecom Americas, China Unicom Americas, Pacific Networks and its subsidiary ComNet, and told them to respond within 30 days. The companies need to explain why the agency shouldn’t move to revoke their authorizations, according to the FCC.
The action reflects “deep concern” among U.S. government agencies, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in an emailed statement.
Pai said the companies are vulnerable “to the exploitation, influence, and control of the Chinese Communist Party, given that they are subsidiaries of Chinese state-owned entities. We simply cannot take a risk and hope for the best when it comes to the security of our networks.”
The U.S. and China are at odds over a suite of issues such as the spread of the novel coronavirus, trade, and security of telecommunications networks. U.S. officials have moved to bar Chinese equipment maker Huawei Technologies Co. as a security threat, an assertion the company denies.
China Telecom “has been operating in good standing in the United States for nearly 20 years,” Ge Yu, a spokesman, said in an email. “We look forward, in the coming weeks, to sharing information with the FCC that speaks to our role as a responsible telecom company.”
Emails to China Unicom weren’t immediately returned, and the telephone system at ComNet’s California offices didn’t accept a voicemail. ComNet and Pacific Networks are owned by Citic Group Corp., a Chinese state-owned limited liability company, according to the FCC. An email to Citic’s telecommunications unit wasn’t immediately returned.
In an earlier filing by U.S. security agencies, the FCC told China Telecom to respond to concerns the Beijing-based telecommunications provider is a national security threat. China Telecom said it “unequivocally” denied the allegations.
The FCC barred China Mobile from the U.S. market last year and said it would review other companies’ record.
Senator Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican, said he supports the FCC’s action.
“No matter their cries to the contrary, these firms are beholden to the Chinese Communist Party, and their operation in the United States will continue to pose a threat to our critical networks as long as it continues,” Cotton said in a news release. “Chairman Pai has rightly identified the magnitude of the Chinese telecom contamination.”
(Updates with statement from China Telecom in sixth paragraph)
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

China says it 'expelled' U.S. Navy vessel from South China Sea

World

China says it 'expelled' U.S. Navy vessel from South China Sea

Adela Suliman and Eric Baculinao and Leou Chen and Ed Flanagan
NBC News
China's military has said it "expelled" a U.S. navy vessel from the hotly contested waters of the South China Sea this week. It said the "USS Barry" had illegally entered China's Xisha territorial waters on Tuesday.
China's Southern Theater army command "organized sea and air forces to track, monitor, verify, and identify the U.S. ships throughout the journey, and warned and expelled them," said Chinese military spokesperson Li Huamin, in a statement.
"The provocative actions of the United States seriously violated relevant international law norms, seriously violated China's sovereignty and security interests, artificially increased regional security risks, and were prone to cause unexpected incidents," he said.
NBC News reached out to American officials who were not immediately available for comment overnight.
The South China Sea is a potentially energy-rich stretch of water and home to more than 200 specks of land. It serves as a gateway to global sea routes where approximately $3.4 trillion of trade passes annually.
The numerous overlapping sovereign claims to islands, reefs and rocks — many of which disappear under high tide — have turned the waters into a zone of competing diplomatic interests, embroiling neighbors. Beijing holds the lion's share of these features with approximately 27 outposts peppered throughout.
Tension has been simmering in the South China Sea, of late, particularly between China and its Asian seafaring neighbors Malaysia and the Philippines.
This month Vietnam also lodged an official protest with China, following the sinking of a Vietnamese fishing boat it said had been rammed by a Chinese maritime surveillance vessel near the Paracel Islands, in the South China Sea. China denied the claims and said the Vietnamese boat had illegally entered the area to fish and refused to leave.
Earlier this month, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told his Southeast Asian counterparts that China was taking advantage of the world’s preoccupation with the coronavirus pandemic to push its territorial ambitions in the South China Sea.
"Beijing has moved to take advantage of the distraction, from China’s new unilateral announcement of administrative districts over disputed islands ... its sinking of a Vietnamese fishing vessel earlier this month, and its ‘research stations’ on Fiery Cross Reef and Subi Reef," Pompeo said in a video meeting with the foreign ministers of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on April 23.
Pompeo also accused China of deploying militarized ships to intimidate other claimant countries from developing offshore gas and oil projects in the region.
Last week, the U.S. Navy said it had partnered with the Australian navy for operations in the South China Sea, which began April 13.
"To bring this much combat capability together here in the South China Sea truly signals to our allies and partners in the region that we are deeply committed to a free and open Indo-Pacific," said Rear Adm. Fred Kacher, commander of the America Expeditionary Strike Group, in a statement.
The U.S. 7th Fleet is the U.S. Navy’s largest numbered fleet and routinely conducts operations in the Indo-Pacific area. It has said that all of its interactions during freedom of navigation movements have been in accordance with international norms.
The U.S. Navy has previously stated that sweeping maritime claims in the South China Sea posed a serious threat to freedom of the seas and the right of innocent passage of all ships.

China has maintained that it has historical sovereign rights in the South China Sea, which neighboring countries have disputed. In this latest interaction, China said the U.S. was not acting "in line" with the wishes of other countries in the region, which want to "maintain peace and stability in that area."
Spokesperson Li also urged the U.S. to instead focus on its national COVID-19 crisis.
"We urge the United States to focus on the prevention and control of its national epidemic situation, do more useful things for international anti-epidemic efforts, and immediately stop military operations that are not conducive to regional security, peace and stability," he said.
The coronavirus pandemic has been a growing source of tension between the world's two largest economies, with both Washington D.C. and Beijing heaping criticism on each others' handling of the outbreak.
Li added that Chinese forces would continue to "resolutely perform their duties" in the South China Sea to "firmly maintain peace and stability."
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
World

US Navy ship sails through Chinese-claimed waters in South China Sea


AFP

Washington (AFP) - A US Navy guided-missile destroyer sailed through waters near the Paracel islands in the South China Sea challenging China's claim to the area, the Navy said Wednesday.
The USS Barry undertook the so-called "freedom of navigation operation" on Tuesday, a week after Beijing upped its claims to the region by designating an official administrative district for the islands.
The US sought to assert the "rights, freedoms and lawful uses of the sea recognized in international law," the Navy said in a statement.
"Unlawful and sweeping maritime claims in the South China Sea pose an unprecedented threat to the freedom of the seas, including the freedoms of navigation and overflight and the right of innocent passage of all ships," it said.
The move came amid a rise in US-China tensions over the novel coronavirus epidemic, in which Washington has accused Beijing of hiding and downplaying the initial outbreak in December and January in the Chinese city of Wuhan.
The United States rejects China's territorial claim to much of the South China Sea, including the Paracels, also claimed by Vietnam and Taiwan.
The region is believed to have valuable oil and gas deposits.
In a statement on the People's Liberation Army website, the Chinese military said it had mobilized sea and air assets to track and warn the US vessel away from "Chinese territorial waters."
The PLA accused the United States of "provocative acts" that "seriously violated international law and China's sovereignty and security interests."
The US action was "also incompatible with the current joint efforts of international community to fight against the COVID-19," it said.
Last week China sought to further advance its territorial claims when it announced that the Paracel and nearby Spratly islands, the Macclesfield Bank and their surrounding waters would be administered under two new districts of Sansha city, which China created on nearby Woody Island in 2012.
It also announced official Chinese names for 80 islands and other geographical features in the South China Sea, including reefs, seamounts, shoals and ridges, 55 of them submerged in water.



 
World


U.S. warship sails through Taiwan Strait, second time in a month


Reuters

TAIPEI, April 24 (Reuters) - A U.S. warship has again sailed through the sensitive Taiwan Strait, Taiwan's Defence Ministry said on Friday, the second time in a month amid heighten tension between Taiwan and China and as a Chinese aircraft carrier passes near the island.
China, which considers Taiwan its own, has been angered by the Trump administration's stepped-up support for the island, such as more arms sales, U.S. patrols near it and a visit to Washington by Vice President-elect William Lai in February.
Taiwan's Defence Ministry said the U.S. warship had transited the narrow Taiwan Strait that separates the island from its giant neighbour China in a southerly direction and was continuing to sail south.
Taiwan's armed forces monitored the ship which it described as being on an "ordinary mission", the ministry added, without providing further details.
Two weeks ago a U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer also sailed through the strait, on the same day that Chinese fighter jets drilled in waters close to the democratically-ruled island.
Taiwan said on Thursday that a Chinese aircraft carrier group had sailed to its south through the Bashi Channel that sits between Taiwan and the Philippines and was heading east.
The carrier group earlier this month sailed down Taiwan's east coast. China said at the time it was on its way to routine exercises in the disputed South China Sea.
China has carried out frequent drills near Taiwan in recent months, including flying fighter jets and nuclear-capable bombers close to the island, in moves denounced by Taipei's government as attempts at intimidation. (Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Michael Perry)

Thứ Tư, 22 tháng 4, 2020

A Letter to The United States Secretary of State, Mr. Mike Pompeo


A Letter to The United States Secretary of State, Mr. Mike Pompeo
Dear The United States Secretary of State, Mr. Mike Pompeo

Subject: The UN Peace Treaty No 1832 related to the US and the United Nations about the Vietnamese Sovereignty on the Paracels and Spratlys archipelagoes, and our request to the US to execute the equality and justice for the Vietnamese People in accordance with the UN Peace Treaty.

Dear the US Secretary of State:
The Peace Treaty with Japan signed in San Francisco on September 8, 1951 at Chapter II, Territory, Article 2, (f) indicates that the Japanese returned two archipelagoes Paracels and Spratlys to the Vietnamese Government delegate led by Prime Minister Tran Van Huu and other members of his cabinet to sign this Treaty on that day. The Communist China and the Chiang Kai Shek governments were absent, and the Communist Vietnam – now the Socialist Republic of Vietnam - was not a legal reality and also absent in the Peace Treaty signature. The Treaty was written in four languages, declared, and signed by the leaders of 49 countries.
The UN Peace Treaty was registered in the USA on August 21, 1952.
We request the US Secretary of State, as US is a historical, spiritual witness and signer in the Peace Treaty No 1832 and the Declaration in San Francisco on Sept. 8, 1951, please help execute the equality and justice for the Vietnamese people that the two archipelagoes belong to the Vietnamese people in accordance with the Peace Treaty declared and signed by the international leaders.
Thank you the United States Secretary of State.

Sincerely,
Hoang Hoa
Vietnam Review Blog Editor
2020/04/22
Attachments

B. The Peace Treaty with Japan. 7. Chapter II Territorial Provisions
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP58-00453R000100300001-1.pdf

Chapter II. Territory. Article 2. (f)
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20136/volume-136-I-1832-English.pdf




Tài Liệu liȇn quan đến Hoa Kỳ và Liȇn Hiệp Quốc (Hoàng Sa và Trường Sa)



Kính gởi đến các cộng đồng người Việt Nam
Tài Liệu liȇn quan đến Hoa Kỳ và Liȇn Hiệp Quốc (Hoàng Sa và Trường Sa)

Hiệp ước Hoà Bình Với Nhật Bản của Liȇn Hiệp Quốc (với hai Tuyȇn Bố) ngày 8 tháng 9 năm 1951 tại San Francisco cho thấy Nhật Bản đã giao hai quần đảo Hoàng Sa và Trường Sa cho nước Việt Nam ký nhận bởi Thủ Tướng nước Việt Nam Trần Văn Hữu với sự chứng kiến của Hoa Kỳ, Pháp và hầu hết các lãnh tụ thế giới.

Chapter II
Territory
Article 2
(f)

Hiệp ước được đăng ký tại Hoa Kỳ ngày 21 tháng 8, 1952.
Trong các lãnh tụ các quốc gia hiện diện không có mặt của Trung Cộng, không có mặt Trung Hoa Dân Quốc của Tưởng Giới Thạch (họ Tưởng đã chạy ra Ðài Loan Formosa vào năm 1949), không có mặt của Việt Minh.
Tất cả những gì Trung Cộng và Phạm Văn Ðồng tuyȇn bố ký kết vào năm 1958 đều vô giá trị vì ngày đó còn Việt Nam Cộng Hoà và Việt Nam Cộng Hòa có toàn chủ quyền trȇn hai quần đảo này. Cho mãi đến hôm nay 2020, tuy VNCH không có lãnh thổ trȇn đất Việt Nam, nhưng về mặt tinh thần và thực tế vẫn còn tồn tại một di sản VNCH một cách hợp pháp vì Hiệp Ðịnh Paris 1973 không hề chấm dứt sự tồn tại của VNCH.
Là một nhân chứng lịch sử ký nhận, công nhận chủ quyền của VNCH trȇn quần đảo Hoàng Sa và Trường Sa qua Hiệp ước SF 1951, Hoa kỳ có trách nhiệm trong việc thực thi sự công bằng cho dân tộc Việt Nam qua Hiệp ước San Francisco ngày 8 tháng 9 năm 1951 và Hiệp Ðịnh Paris 1973, và Hoa Kỳ có hoàn toàn quyền can thiệp vào những biến cố tại hai quần đảo này theo đúng tinh thần luật pháp quốc tế về Hiệp ước 8 tháng 9 1951 của Liȇn Hiệp Quốc tại San Francisco.

Quan Ðiểm Việt Nam
2020/04/22