Thứ Ba, 10 tháng 3, 2020

Rights groups condemn 10-year jail term for Vietnam blogger


World

Rights groups condemn 10-year jail term for Vietnam blogger

AFPMarch 9, 2020, 10:51 PM PDT

Source:  https://www.yahoo.com/news/rights-groups-condemn-10-jail-term-vietnam-blogger-052556775.html
 Vietnamese blogger Truong Duy Nhat was a regular contributor to Radio Free Asia and a critic of the government (AFP Photo/-)
Vietnamese blogger Truong Duy Nhat was a regular contributor to Radio Free Asia and a critic of the government (AFP Photo/-)
The jailing of a Vietnamese blogger for 10 years was condemned by rights groups Tuesday as "unacceptable" and an attack on free speech.
Truong Duy Nhat, a regular contributor to Radio Free Asia, was found guilty in a brief trial Monday of defrauding the public of $560,000 when he worked for a state-owned newspaper in the central city of Danang in 2004, state media said.
Describing the sentence as "harsh and totally unacceptable", Reporters Without Borders (RSF) called for the "immediate release" of Nhat who had posted articles critical of the government on his blog.
RSF ranked Vietnam 176th on its 2019 World Press Freedom Index as one of the world's biggest jailers of journalists and bloggers.
"Officially convicted of abusing his professional position, he is in fact paying dearly for his professionalism," said Daniel Bastard, RSF's Asia-Pacific director.
Radio Free Asia also condemned the conviction as "unjust" and "a blow against free speech and free expression."
All media in Vietnam is state-run and independent journalism and bloggers are banned.
Since its hardline leadership took power in 2016, the country's single-party state has tightened its grip on criticism and different viewpoints.
This is Nhat's second prison stint. He was jailed for two years in 2014 for "abusing democratic freedoms" for critical blog postings.
He was discovered in a Vietnamese prison in March last year after fleeing to Thailand seeking refugee status with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
The circumstances of Nhat's return to Vietnam were never clarified by Hanoi.

Don’t Let the Chinese Government Escape Blame for Coronavirus’s Initial Spread


World

Don’t Let the Chinese Government Escape Blame for Coronavirus’s Initial Spread

Therese Shaheen
National ReviewMarch 10, 2020, 3:30 AM PDT
 Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/don-t-let-chinese-government-103028577.html

From almost the very beginning of the COVID-19/coronavirus crisis in January and early February, it’s often been asked whether it might be the “Chinese Chernobyl.” Could the crisis expose the weakness of the mix of oppression, information control, and social disgust that underpin the Chinese Communist regime and trigger its collapse? Others have suggested that it might instead be “president Xi Jinping’s Tiananmen,” meaning he will use all the tools at his disposal to tighten down and prevent, well . . . a Chinese Chernobyl.
It is too soon to know what may happen. But it’s not too soon for attempts to whitewash the timeline and Chinese-government actions in the earliest moments of the crisis. Indeed, even now, the level of public anxiety about both the virus and what the Chinese government is doing and saying about it remain high.
 
It is helpful to review the current status and the timeline that got us here. On Monday, February 24, the World Health Organization determined that reported cases of COVID-19/coronavirus had peaked. At the time, there were about 76,000 reported cases in China, and about 1,800 cases elsewhere in the world. In the United States, there were 14 reported cases. As of March 7, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and state and local public health reporting suggest the number is more than 300 cases, a twenty-fold increase. Globally, there are more than 100,000 cases, with more than 350 deaths in Italy alone.
The world has barely begun to reckon with what the Chinese government claims to have gotten under control. It’s true that forced quarantining and other extreme measures in China played a critical role. The World Health Organization report of its February mission to China praises the PRC for its response: “The response structures in China were rapidly put in place according to existing emergency plans and aligned from the top to the bottom. This was replicated at the four levels of government (national, provincial, prefecture and county/district).” The leader of the World Health Organization mission to China in February, Canadian epidemiologist Dr. Bruce Aylward, encouraged the world to “access the expertise of China,” adding that “if I had COVID-19, I’d want to be treated in China.”
But the WHO report and subsequent reporting about what the world can learn from China represents a real-time cleansing of the actual record, a record that includes intentional obfuscation and failure to respond in the early stages of the crisis. This includes the government’s early attempts to stifle communication about the virus, the censorship of doctors and others on social media as cases were being observed in late December, and the continuing suppression of information on social media across the country about how the government, from President Xi Jinping to local administrators, continues to mislead the public and the rest of the world.
On March 3, researchers at the University of Toronto Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy published “Censured Contagion,” a report that meticulously documents a timeline and body of facts that paint quite a different picture than the WHO report, and placing WHO’s accolades for China’s “response structures” that were “rapidly put in place” in doubt. The WHO report concludes that the beginning of the epidemic was December 30, 2019, with the collection of samples from a pneumonia patient in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital. Data provided in graphics in the report show essentially zero cases before that date.
Yet the Munk School researchers found that censorship of certain keywords in social media had already begun by then. They highlight social-media reports during the prior week by doctors reporting an unknown pathogen, linking it to the Wuhan seafood market. By December 31, social-media channels, including WeChat, were already censoring the terms “Wuhan seafood market” and “unknown Wuhan pneumonia.”
As careful as the recent Munk School report is, its essential elements were available to WHO researchers before they made their February 16-24 trip and wrote their report praising the PRC response. On February 1, the Washington Post published a story excoriating Beijing’s early handling of the outbreak. The story includes anecdotes consistent with the Munk School analysis, such as how the Wuhan Public Security Bureau on New Year’s Day had begun detaining people for “spreading ‘rumours’ about Wuhan hospitals receiving SARS-like cases.”  The government-controlled Xinhua News Agency, the Post reported, called on those online to “jointly build a harmonious, clear and bright cyberspace.”
WHO and its director-general, the Ethiopian politician Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, have received criticism for their own response to the crisis. Michael Collins at the Council on Foreign Relations labeled it a joint “dereliction of duty” in a searing blog post in late February. Collins correctly concludes that WHO “laundered” the PRC record, damaging its own credibility by doing so.
The most galling result of that image-burnishing is the ubiquity of coverage — and repetition by third parties who don’t care to find out the truth — to the effect that the world should actually thank the PRC for its strong reaction, because it bought the world the necessary time to prepare for the challenge. Science magazine online, the publication of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science, posed the question this week: “Can China’s COVID-19 strategy work elsewhere?” This is just one example.
This reflects what we already know about the Chinese government. It is developing into a modern state, one whose public-health system has significantly advanced from its ordeal with the SARS epidemic just 20 years ago. Per capita wealth is up more than 300 percent, and the Chinese share of the global GDP has more than doubled, from about 7 percent to more than 16 percent over the same period.
Alongside that growth and progress, though, China under President Xi is ever more repressive. It uses some of the most sophisticated technology in the world simply to control its population.  That includes Internet censorship, social-media monitoring and tracking of ordinary citizens, and the mass detention of Muslims and other minorities.
But Chinese government face-saving is not stopping at the Chinese border. It is also attempting to control the narrative through state-controlled media, and through their willing partners in the West, including WHO. Government propagandists published a compendium of state-news agency articles, official government statements, and other documents in a book called A Battle Against Epidemic: China Combatting COVID-19 in 2020. The publication faced immediate scorn in social media within the country.
Fortunately, despite the well-documented censorship of social media, citizen journalism continues. A popular meme shows Dr. Li Wenliang, the Wuhan ophthalmologist whose social media questioned the “Wuhan pneumonia” in late December and who eventually died from the virus, with barbed wire where his facemask should be. Several citizen journalists have gone missing, including in Shandong province, where there have been reports including in the Epoch Times that significant underreporting of COVID-19 by official statistics continues despite the WHO declaration that the caseload has peaked.
In times of duress, the most innate qualities of countries tend to predominate. That’s what we’ve seen with the PRC. We can recognize the intensity of China’s public-health response. But we should acknowledge and condemn the methods by which the world was kept in the dark for too long, and the means by which Beijing continues to interrupt the flow of information. We should not be thanking Beijing for its actions. Instead, we need honesty and the pursuit of the truth to defeat this challenge. And we must acknowledge that the Chinese government’s actions early on almost certainly led to the global crisis we’re facing.
More from National Review

Thứ Hai, 9 tháng 3, 2020

Vietnamese influencers who attended fashion weeks in Europe test positive for COVID-19


Vietnamese influencers who attended fashion weeks in Europe test positive for COVID-19
Yahoo Lifestyle SEAMarch 8, 2020, 11:38 PM PDT

Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/vietnamese-influencer-27-who-attended-fashion-weeks-tested-positive-for-covid-19-063813809.html

 Nga Nguyen attends the Fashion For Relief London 2019 dinner at The British Museum on September 14, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by David M. Benett/Dave Benett/Getty Images for Fashion For Relief)
Nga Nguyen attends the Fashion For Relief London 2019 dinner at The British Museum on September 14, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by David M. Benett/Dave Benett/Getty Images for Fashion For Relief)Since Friday (6 March), Vietnam had reported 14 new cases, bringing its total to 30. Among the latest cases, two influencers were reported to be tested positive for COVID-19. The two women, who are sisters Nga Nguyen, 27 and Nguyen Hong Nhung, 26, had attended fashion week events in Europe, according to the South China Morning Post (SCMP).The two sisters attended fashion weeks in Milan and Paris, and even documented their travels on their personal Instagram before deleting their posts. Prior to arriving in Hanoi, the two sisters, who come from a wealthy family of steelmakers, flew business class via Vietnam Airlines, Coconuts Media reported.
Fashion editors who attended the shows in Europe have been asked by their companies and governments to self-quarantine at home. One magazine editor Grace Jiajing, who attended Milan and Paris Fashion Weeks, documented her stay-at-home notice by Singapore’s Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) in various posts.
In a post, Jiajing, editor-in-chief of PIN Prestige, said she received three notifications by text messages, asking her to verify if she had been staying at home, and in another paragraph, she said that an officer from ICA even requested for a photo verification.
Restrictions were in place over at Milan Fashion Week, with some fashion houses opting out of public viewing. One was the Armani house, who closed its autumn/winter show to the public and livestreamed the event instead.
According to Camera Nazionale della Moda Italiana, Italy's fashion chamber, at least 1,000 Chinese fashion reporters, buyers and designers skipped Milan’s Fashion Month, the period in February when designers showcase their collections.
As for Paris Fashion Week, some Chinese brands including Shiatzy Chen, Masha Ma, Calvin Luo, Maison Mai and Uma Wang dropped out of shows. LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton​ canceled a reception for its 2020 LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers, although no reason was given.

Thứ Sáu, 6 tháng 3, 2020

Vietnam Buying $3 Billion in U.S. Farm Goods to Ease Trump Tariff Threats

Vietnam Buying $3 Billion in U.S. Farm Goods to Ease Trump Tariff Threats

Nguyen Dieu Tu Uyen
(Bloomberg) -- Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world threatened by trade wars. Sign up here. 
Vietnam, looking to allay the Trump administration’s wrath over its soaring trade surplus with the U.S., is committing to buy $3 billion in farm products from Nebraska.
The agricultural shopping spree is part of a campaign to address complaints about the trade surplus and difficulties U.S. companies face in accessing Vietnamese markets.
“We see a lot of room to increase purchases from America, and that will significantly help narrow our trade gap with the U.S.,” said Nguyen Do Anh Tuan, the agriculture ministry’s spokesman, who was part of a recent Vietnamese delegation to meet farm-product producers in the U.S. “Our demand for American farming products is very high.”
Vietnamese companies signed 18 agreements with American producers to buy about $3 billion of farm products in the next two to three years, Tuan, director general of the agriculture ministry’s international cooperation department, said in an interview. The deals include purchases of 100,000 cows, 3 million tons of wheat and barley worth as much as $800 million, and fruit, corn and soy animal feed, according to Tuan.
“We will have regular meetings with these Vietnamese companies to give them timely support in implementing the signed MOUs,” Tuan said. “We also want to buy more high-tech equipment from the U.S. to make more value-added farm products in the future.”
Wrath of Trump
Vietnam’s leaders are doing all they can to avoid China’s fate after U.S. President Donald Trump, asked in June 2019 if he wanted to impose tariffs on Vietnam, described the Southeast Asian nation as “almost the single worst abuser of everybody.”
Vietnam’s exports to the U.S. reached $61.3 billion in 2019, widening the trade gap to $47 billion from $34.8 billion in 2018, according to Vietnamese customs data. The U.S. Census Bureau reports a $55.8 billion trade deficit with Vietnam for 2019 and $39.5 billion for 2018.
In an interview last year, Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc promised that Vietnam would buy more U.S. products, such as Boeing Co. aircraft. In August, state-run Vietnam National Coal-Mineral Industries announced it was negotiating to buy U.S. coal for the first time, from Xcoal Energy & Resources LLC.
Vietnam is cracking down on fake labeling of Chinese goods being routed through its territory to bypass U.S. tariffs. Meanwhile, the central bank and government ministries have vowed to address U.S. concerns about Vietnam’s monetary policy and trade surplus with the U.S., after the Treasury added Vietnam to a watchlist of countries being monitored for possible currency manipulation.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said last year that Vietnam needs to resolve “market access restrictions related to goods, services, agricultural products, and intellectual property.”
Vietnam is working to address Lighthizer’s concerns, Tuan said.
“We will work on changes in some relevant regulations to make it easier for American companies to sell more in Vietnam,” he said. “We are trying to create opportunities for businesses of the two countries to boost trade exchange in a fair manner. This will surely help the bilateral relations between Vietnam and the U.S.”
(Updates with quote from Tuan in fifth paragraph.)
To contact the reporter on this story: Nguyen Dieu Tu Uyen in Hanoi at uyen1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: John Boudreau at jboudreau3@bloomberg.net, Michael S. Arnold
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

Thứ Ba, 25 tháng 2, 2020

Apple may be forced to disclose censorship requests from China

Business

Apple may be forced to disclose censorship requests from China

William Turvill
The Guardian
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/apple-may-forced-disclose-censorship-070043402.html
<span>Photograph: Lucas Jackson/Reuters</span>
Photograph: Lucas Jackson/Reuters
Apple could be forced to disclose details of censorship requests from China and other nations after two major shareholder groups backed a proposal that would force the tech firm to make new human rights commitments.
The motion, set to be voted on by the company’s investors on Wednesday, was prompted by numerous allegations of Apple kowtowing to Beijing and blocking apps from being used by Chinese customers.
Related: Apple warns of coronavirus causing iPhone shortages
If approved by investors, the scheme could have implications beyond China and potentially expose details of tensions between Apple and other jurisdictions. The California-headquartered tech giant has regularly clashed with the US government, including most prominently over requests for iPhones to be unlocked.
The human rights resolution was put forward by campaign group SumOfUs, which cited several concerns about Apple’s relationship with the Chinese state in its submission to investors.
Apple failed in an attempt to block the vote from taking place. And now the Guardian has learned that the proposal has the support of the influential corporate governance groups ISS and Glass Lewis.
Together these two firms advise the world’s largest institutional investors on how they vote at company’s annual meetings, so their backing for the proposal is a coup for SumOfUs.
Ahead of Wednesday’s annual meeting, ISS and Glass Lewis have sent reports to their clients, seen by the Guardian, explaining why they should back the proposal.
Glass Lewis said: “[W]e believe that it would be prudent for the company to exhibit enhanced transparency around how it respects the right to free expression.”
In their reports, both Glass Lewis and ISS highlighted various news reports of Apple making apps unavailable in China.
In 2016, it emerged that Apple had removed its iBooks Store and iTunes Movies services from devices owned by Chinese customers. In 2017, it removed several virtual private network (VPN) apps, which were used by Chinese citizens to bypass state censorship apparatus. And last year the company removed HKMap.Live, a controversial crowdsourced mapping app that was being used by Hong Kong protesters to track police activity.
The SumOfUs proposal would force Apple’s board to prepare an annual report on the company’s policies relating to freedom of expression and access to information. The board would be compelled to state in the report whether they are “publicly committed to freedom of expression and access to information”.
They would also have to disclose a “description of the actions Apple has taken in the past year in response to government or third-party demands that were reasonably likely to limit free expression or access to information”.
SumOfUs believes the need to clarify Apple’s relationship with China is made particularly urgent by public outrage surrounding Beijing’s treatment of Uighur people sent to internment camps and pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong.
Despite backing from ISS and Glass Lewis, SumOfUs still faces an uphill battle to pass the motion because it is opposed by Apple’s board, which includes the company’s chief executive, Tim Cook, and former US vice-president Al Gore.
Apple has issued a statement saying the proposal is “unnecessary based on the extensive information that is already publicly provided to our shareholders and users”.
The company currently publishes transparency data disclosing the number of government requests it receives by country for customer data and app removal.
For instance, Apple reported that between January and June last year, 288 apps were removed in mainland China for “legal” or “platform” violation. Apple stated that the majority of these requests related to pornography, “illegal content” and gambling.
But in its report to investors, ISS noted that the “quantitative approach to the company’s transparency report provides little context for the app removal requests from the Chinese government or explanation of the risks that may be involved”.
Apple said in its statement that free expression “is central to our company and its success” but that it is obliged to “comply with local laws and to protect the safety of our customers and employees”, including by removing apps.
The company said: “[W]hile we may disagree with certain decisions at times, we do not believe it would be in the best interests of our users to simply abandon markets, which would leave consumers with fewer choices and fewer privacy protections.”
The Daily Beast

White House May Ask Congress for $1B to Fight Coronavirus: RPT

White House May Ask Congress for $1B to Fight Coronavirus: RPT
Source:  https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-melania-ivanka-jared-visited-181446065.html
 


Thứ Bảy, 22 tháng 2, 2020

My name is Hoàng Hoa,

Kính thưa Ông Superintendent, and ESUHSD Board of Trustees,

My name is Hoàng Hoa,

Thank you for letting me to be at the podium reading my Comments, one in English, and one in Vietnamese.

I come to the Board meeting today to strongly support the YB Principal as well as your clear, impartial decision, and the loyalty to the Board’s Policy of the fairness and justice to the YB case involving the YB Principal.

I urge you to reconsider the authority of the Board member that was suspected to violate the District’s Policy if she has enough credibility, impartiality, and fairness to vote or make any remarks on the Principal’s personal and career documents during the decision-making motions relating to the YB case?

I urge you to reconsider and delete in time any of the remarks, critics, notes of this Board member on behalf of the ESUHSD Governing Board on the Principal’s personal and career documents because of her suspected violating to the District’s Policy.

I urge you to support the YB and the East Side community by restoring the honor and model figure of the YB Principal for her dedicated works towards the education of the young generations of the East Side community.

Thank you,

---

Thưa Ông Superintendent, và Board of Trustees,

Tȇn tôi là Hoàng Hoa,

Cám ơn quý vị đã cho phép tôi đứng tại podium để đọc Comments của tôi bằng tiếng Anh và Việt.

Tôi đến buổi họp Board hôm nay để ủng hộ mạnh mẽ cô Hiệu Trưởng YB cũng như sắp tới là quyết định trong sáng, vô tư và sự trung thành với Chính sách của Board về sự công bằng và công lý đối với vụ YB liȇn quan cô Hiệu Trưởng YB.

Tôi yȇu cầu quý vị xét lại quyền hạn của một Ủy viȇn Học Khu được nghi ngờ là vi phạm Chính sách của Học Khu liệu người này có còn đủ tin tưởng, sự vô tư, và công bằng khi bỏ phiếu hay phȇ phán trong các tài liệu cá nhân hay nghề nghiệp của cô Hiệu Trưởng trong những động thái có tính quyết định đối với vụ YB?

Tôi yȇu cầu quý vị xét lại và gở bỏ kịp lúc bất cứ nhận xét, phȇ bình, hay ghi chú nào mà người Ủy viȇn này đã nhân danh Hội Ðồng Quản Trị của Học Khu East Side ghi trȇn các tài liệu cá nhân hay nghề nghiệp của cô Hiệu Trưởng bởi vì Người Ủy viȇn này đã bị nghi ngờ vi phạm Chính Sách của Học Khu.

Tôi yȇu cầu quý vị ủng hộ trường Trung Học YB và cộng đồng East Side bằng cách phục hồi danh dự và hình ảnh mẫu mực của cô Hiệu Trưởng YB vì những nổ lực của cô hướng đến sự giáo dục các thế hệ trẻ trong cộng đồng East Side.

Cám ơn quý vị,


Thứ Tư, 19 tháng 2, 2020

DANH SÁCH DÂN ĐỒNG TÂM BỊ CÔNG AN BẮT ĐI BIỆT TĂM TỪ 9/1/2020

DANH SÁCH DÂN ĐỒNG TÂM BỊ CÔNG AN BẮT ĐI BIỆT TĂM TỪ 9/1/2020

AddThis Sharing Buttons
 
Source:  https://thoibao.de/danh-sach-dan-dong-tam-bi-cong-an-bat-di-biet-tam-tu-9-1-2020
Danh sách người bị bắt ở Đồng Tâm

“Đồng bào ơi, anh chị em ơi!
Hỡi lương tâm tất cả loài người”
… (Tố Hữu)
Hãy nhớ Đồng Tâm ngày mồng 9 tháng Giêng!
Hai câu thơ trên của Tố Hữu 60 năm trước lại ứng với Đồng Tâm hôm nay. Đêm mồng 8, rạng 9/1/2020, nhằm ngày Rằm tháng chạp, 3.000 cánh sát vũ trang đã đánh úp vào thôn Hoành xã Đồng Tâm, huyện Mỹ Đức, Hà Nội, giết hại dã man Cụ Lê Đình Kình 84 tuổi đời 58 tuổi đảng, đang ngủ trong nhà mình, và bắt đi 26 người dân, nay vẫn biệt tăm (xem Danh sách).
Đó là hành động vô Pháp, vô Đạo, chấn động nhân tâm, kinh Thiên động Địa… Đến nay không khí khủng bố vẫn bao trùm xóm làng. Phải rất khó khăn, qua nhiều nguồn mới có được Danh sách những người bị bắt đi biệt tăm từ ngày 9/1/2020.
Tôi tha thiết kêu gọi các Tổ chức, các Luật sư, các nhà hoạt động xã hội trong nước và quốc tế hãy mau trợ giúp pháp lý, giúp đỡ những người bị hại và thân nhân họ tìm lại Công lý, Danh dự…
Xin hay chia sẻ thông tin này được rộng rãi.
“Người trong một nước phải thương nhau cùng”!
Xin đa tạ.
Mạc Văn Trang
Nhà giáo, sinh 1938, ở Ngọc Khánh, Ba Đình, Hà Nội.
6/2/2020
Danh sách người bị bắt ở Đồng Tâm
Danh sách người bị bắt ở Đồng Tâm
DANH SÁCH NHỮNG NGƯỜI DÂN THÔN HOÀNH,
XÃ ĐỒNG TÂM, HUYỆN MỸ ĐỨC, HÀ NỘI, BỊ CÔNG AN BẮT SÁNG 9/1/2020
TT HỌ TÊN TUỔI GHI CHÚ

1 Lê Đình Công 55 Con cụ Lê Đình Kình
2 Lê Đình Chức 40 Con cụ Lê Đình Kình
3 Lê Đình Doanh 34 Cháu nội cụ Lê Đình Kình
4 Lê Đình Uy 31 Cháu nội cụ Lê Đình Kình
5 Lê Đình Quang 37 Cháu họ cụ Lê Đình Kình
6 Trần Thị Phương 40 Vợ anh Tiến cùng bị bắt
7 Trần Thị La 42 Mẹ đơn thân, để lại con
8 Mai Thị Phần 55
9 Nguyễn Thị Dung 57
10 Nguyễn Văn Điều 64
11 Bùi Viết Tiến 17
12 Bùi Văn Tuấn 40
13 Bùi Viết Hiệu 74
14 Nguyễn Quốc Tiến 40 Anh Tiến và chị Kim 2 vợ chồng
15 Đào Thị Kim 38 Vợ anh Tiến để lại 3 con nhỏ ở nhà
16 Nguyễn Văn Quân 40 Đơn thân, để lại 3 con nhỏ.
17 Nguyễn Thị Bét 58
18 Nguyễn Thị Đục 55
19 Nguyễn Văn Tuyển 48
20 Nguyễn Văn Niên 40
21 Nguyễn Thị Lụa 53
22 Lê Đình Quân 44
23 Trịnh Văn Hải 40
24 Bùi Thị Nối 56
25 Bùi Văn Tiến 41
26 Nguyễn Văn Duệ 52
Ghi chú:
1. Anh Nguyễn Quốc Tuấn và chị Đào Thị Kim là 2 vợ chồng, cùng bị bắt, để lại 3 con nhỏ: sinh 2004, 2007 và 2013
2. Anh Bùi Văn Tiến và chị Trần Thị Phương là 2 vợ chồng cùng bị bắt để lại 3 con: 2007, 2013 và bé 18 tháng tuổi.
3. Trần Thị La, Mẹ đơn thân, để lại 1 con nhỏ
4. Nguyễn Văn Quân, bố đơn thân, để lại 3 con nhỏ
5. Lê Đình Chức: 3 con nhỏ, vợ mới sinh con 10 ngà
y
Ngày 06/02/2020
Danh sách người bị bắt ở Đồng Tâm
Nguồn: Facebook Mạc Văn Trang