How to Make China Pay
John Yoo and Ivana Stradner
https://www.yahoo.com/news/china-pay-183117304.html
One of the big questions facing the international community
today is how to hold China legally and politically accountable for all its
dishonesty and harm to people around the world. According to reports, U.S.
intelligence agencies have confirmed to the White House that China has
deliberately understated the number of its people who have contracted and died
from the coronavirus epidemic. Such deceit follows Beijing’s recklessness in
suppressing news of the origins, rapid spread, and lethality of COVID-19 in
December and January. Chinese officials punished doctors who tried to warn of
the outbreak in Wuhan, slowed identification and research on the virus, and
allowed thousands to leave the region for the rest of the world.
If China were an individual, a company, or a law-abiding
nation, it would be required to provide compensation for the harm it has
inflicted globally. The United States alone may well suffer 200,000 or more
deaths, billions in health-care costs, trillions in lost economic activity, and
trillions more in new government spending. China’s failures render it legally
liable under international law, but the COVID-19 crisis has exposed the crisis
of ineffectiveness and corruption of international institutions. Instead of
focusing on international law, the U.S. should thus protect its national
interests by opting for the self-help mechanism.
International institutions provide no meaningful way to
force China to remedy the harm it has caused. The United Nations Security
Council, allegedly the supreme lawmaking and executive body in international
law, cannot hold China to account because China and Russia exercise their
permanent right to veto any Security Council resolution. China has rendered the
U.N. impotent, even though U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has declared
the COVID-19 pandemic the world’s most challenging crisis since World War II,
as it has become a threat to international peace and security by shutting down
swaths of the global economy and killing thousands, if not millions.
The U.S. and its allies also could try to sue China before
an international tribunal, such as the International Court of Justice, although
countries have never been sued for their violation of
infectious-disease treaties. But even if a court were to
judge China responsible for the injury caused by its handling of COVID-19,
China would just ignore any decision. When the Permanent Court of Arbitration
found that China’s construction of artificial islands in the South China Sea
violated international law, Beijing simply ignored the ruling. A Chinese
official declared that the judgment was “nothing more than a piece of paper.”
We should expect nothing different from China in the case of the COVID-19
pandemic.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has only a weak,
non-binding dispute-resolution mechanism, but China’s failure to promptly
report the coronavirus outbreak to the organization violated the International
Health Regulations, which require states to notify the WHO of potential
public-health emergencies “of international concern.”
In fact, China has used its financial war chest to
manipulate the WHO. China’s annual funding of the organization, which relies on
voluntary donations, has increased to $86 million since 2014 (a rise of 52
percent). The WHO’s director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has praised
China’s leadership for its “openness to share information” with the
international community and stated that China “has bought the world time”
regarding the coronavirus. In January, the WHO parroted China’s line that there
was no “clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel
coronavirus.” The WHO has also followed the Chinese line on Taiwan, excluding
it from membership and barring it from COVID-19 response meetings. While some
scholars have suggested that a larger budget would make the WHO more effective,
the Trump administration has rightly halved America’s contribution. Not only
has the WHO become a Chinese client, but it also spends
$200 million a year on luxury travel. The U.S. should
investigate the WHO and its director general and expose
their ties with China.
Rather than rely on corrupt, conflicted international
institutions such as the WHO, the United States and its allies should engage in
self-help. To protect against the next virus outbreak, the U.S. should create a
new monitoring mechanism that can detect global health threats early, spread
information about them reliably, and coordinate national efforts to develop a
response. The International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspection regime for
illicit nuclear weapons could provide a model. The U.S. and other wealthy
nations could establish a similar inspection regime and provide financial
assistance to developing nations that agree to participate. “Trust but verify”
could become the watchword not just for Ronald Reagan’s nuclear-reduction treaties
with the Soviets, but for a truly effective global health system.
The U.S. should also punish China for its coronavirus
failings as an incentive for Beijing to mend its ways. Washington could
persuade leading nations to join it in excluding Chinese scholars and students
from scientific research centers and universities. China has used its Thousand
Talents program to recruit scientists to help steal sensitive technology from
American laboratories. Confucius Institutes have spread propaganda while masquerading
as Chinese cultural centers. Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas) and Representative
Francis Rooney (R., Fla.) have introduced the Stop Higher Education Espionage
and Theft Act to help colleges protect against threats by foreign actors.
According to China experts, President Xi Jinping depends on
a humming economy and appeals to nationalism for his political legitimacy. The
U.S. and its allies could strike at the heart of the Chinese Communist Party’s
(CCP) claim to a mandate from heaven by further ratcheting up the pressure on
Beijing to adopt a more cooperative, transparent stance on public health by
imposing economic sanctions and inflicting serious economic harm on China. The
Trump administration could enhance its efforts to exclude China from buying and
selling
advanced technologies, such as microchips, artificial
intelligence, or biotechnology. It took an important step in that direction
this week by implementing new measures on
chip exports to Huawei. In addition, the U.S. should use
targeted sanctions on specific CCP leaders and their supporters by freezing
their assets and prohibiting their travel. The administration needs to impose
pain on CCP supporters so that they will want to change policy to alleviate
their own economic losses.
In addition to halting any further trade cooperation with
Beijing, the administration could also seize the assets of Chinese state-owned
companies. Under its Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing reportedly has loaned
billions to developing nations in Africa, Eastern Europe, and Latin America, and
then taken over their strategic ports and facilities once the debts fall due.
The U.S. could turn this strategy on its head by supporting the expropriation
of these assets by legal process and the cancellation of these debts as
compensation for coronavirus losses.
Seizing Chinese property would allow the United States to
finally use international law to its advantage. Let China try to go to court
and claim that the U.S., its allies, and the developing world have violated
international rules. Let Beijing try to show that these nations have no right
to compensation for its coverup of the coronavirus outbreak. Let the Chinese
Communist Party try to claim, outside its own borders, just as it does within
them, that it can deny common sense and blame the very victims of its
wrongdoing for the worst public-health catastrophe in a century.
John Yoo is the Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law
at the University of California at Berkeley, a visiting scholar at the American
Enterprise Institute, and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution at
Stanford University. Ivana Stradner is a Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow at the
American Enterprise Institute.
More from National Review
